Showing results for ""

Well, it’s that time of year again.  It’s actually that time of year again for a lot of things, but one of them is recognizing the Top Producers in Top Echelon Network during the previous calendar year.

Top-Producing RecruitersOf course, we’ll be formally recognizing these Preferred Member recruiters at the upcoming 2012 National Convention at the Gaylord Opryland Resort in Nashville, Tenn., next month, but in the meantime, we’d also like to recognize them in The Pinnacle Newsletter Blog.

We’re going to start with the Top 10 Producers Overall in the Network during the 2011 calendar year.  The number-one recruiter for 2011 was Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group.  Cameron was fourth in 2010, and he made the leap to the top spot last year.

Sean Napoles, CPC of Career Brokers, Inc., who was number-one in 2010, was second last year.  Jim Strickland of BioSource International broke into the Top 10 by finishing in third place.

Below is the complete list of the Top 10 Producers Overall for 2011:

Trey Cameron1st—Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group

2nd—Sean Napoles, CPC of Career Brokers, Inc.

3rd—Jim Strickland of BioSource International

4th—Denise Milano Sprung of JA Pharma, Inc.

5th—Russell Schutt, CSP of Progressive Executive, Inc.

6th—Angela Marasco of A. Marasco Recruiting, LLC

7th—Judy Kaplan of Prof’l Recruiting Consultants

8th—David M. Sgro, CPC of True North Consultants, Inc.

9th—Steve Brody of Executive Resource Systems

10th—Jim Fitzpatrick of Fitzpatrick & Associates

We’d like to congratulate all of these recruiters and thank them for their hard work and dedication as Preferred Members of our Network.  Their efforts are greatly appreciated, and we certainly wish them even more success in the future.

We’ll be publishing the winners of other 2011 awards in future issues of The Pinnacle Newsletter Blog.

— — —

330.455.1433, Ext. 172
MDemaree@TopEchelon.com
Connect with Mark on LinkedIn.
Follow Mark on Twitter.

(By MARK DEMAREE)

Mark DemareeCongratulations to those Preferred Member recruiters who earned enough Frequent Placer Program (FPP) points to receive cash back for their involvement in Top Echelon Network in 2011!

Keep reading . . .

Our goal is to help YOU make split placements, so much so that we’re willing to pay you for making split placements! That’s right, if you don’t know (or perhaps if you’ve forgotten), we have what is called the Frequent Placer Program within the Network.

This program is a cash-back program designed to reward recruiters in Top Echelon for participation within the Network.  The more you do, the more FPP points you earn.  The more FPP points you earn, the more cash you’ll receive back at the end of the calendar year.  It’s that simple.

Making split placements is just ONE way that you can earn FPP points throughout the year.  You can also earn points (and cash) by participating in activities that we believe lead to split placements.  Below is a list of ways to earn Frequent Placer Program points:

  • Making split placements
  • Making split placements with new Preferred Members
  • Scheduling face-to-face and telephone interviews
  • Attending a Top Echelon Network conference
  • Adding candidates and job orders to the split databases
  • Participation in Virtual and Regional Core Group meetings

Click here to read more about the Top Echelon Network Frequent Placer Program.  In addition to a complete listing of information, there’s also a short video that you can watch which highlights some of the major points of the program and how you can take advantage of it.

I’d like to congratulate those Top Echelon recruiters who earned cash-back rewards for their Network participation in 2011, and I encourage you to participate as much as possible in 2012.  We’ll be waiting to give you a check for your efforts at the end of the year!

— — —

330.455.1433, Ext. 172
MDemaree@TopEchelon.com
Connect with Mark on LinkedIn.
Follow Mark on Twitter.

Mark Demaree

Every once in a while, we make changes to the Top Echelon Network Policies.  Sometimes those changes are small (most of the time, actually), and sometimes they’re bigger.  Our latest round of revisions to the Policies include both big and small changes.

I’ll be mentioning the bigger changes specifically in this issue of The Pinnacle Newsletter Blog.  However, I’m going to bypass the smaller changes, and I’m doing so because they do not significantly alter the wording or spirit of the Policies.  In the vast majority of instances, these changes were made to make the Policies more grammatically correct in terms of punctuation and usage (first person vs. third person, for example).

To point out each and every time we changed “us” to “Top Echelon Network” would probably bore you to tears . . . so we’re not going to do it.  However, we do want to point out the following, more important changes to the Top Echelon Network Policies.  The specific policies we’ll be addressing are Policy #3, Policy #5Policy #9b, and Policy #11. For each of these, I’ll present an “Overview,” the “Old Version,” and the “Revised Version.”  This is a lengthy blog post, but please bear with us.  We want to communicate as clearly as possible these major changes.

Policy #3: 3-Way Splits


OVERVIEW:

The verbiage “does not encourage” has been replaced with “prohibits” as it relates to 3-way splits unless prior written consent from all parties is obtained.

OLD VERSION:

Top Echelon Network does not encourage 3-WAY SPLITS with recruiters outside of Top Echelon Network, but does not prohibit Members from participating in them.

REVISED VERSION:

Top Echelon Network prohibits 3-WAY SPLITS with recruiters inside or outside of Top Echelon Network without prior written consent from all parties involved, including Top Echelon Network.

Policy #5: The Complaint Procedure

OVERVIEW:

The Complaint Procedure was revised to provide added detail to Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the policy.  Two sections of the policy were consolidated, which were, “The Negotiations, mediation, and arbitration” section with the “I don’t agree with Top Echelon’s decision or the EAB’s decision” section.  Lastly, the location and terms of arbitration and mediation were updated.

OLD VERSION:

I don’t agree with Top Echelon Network’s decision or the EAB’s decision

Once Top Echelon Network makes a decision on a Phase #2 dispute, the decision is final, and whatever action Top Echelon Network deems necessary will begin immediately upon the announcement of the decision. The recourse available to a recruiter who does not agree with the Phase #2 decision is as follows:

1. Pay the $1,500 processing fee and request that your dispute be re-opened, escalated to Phase #3, and heard by the Top Echelon Network EAB.
2. Get the other recruiter to agree to resolve the dispute via outside formal arbitration.
3. Hire an attorney and pursue it through the appropriate court system.

Once the Top Echelon Network EAB makes a decision on a Phase #3 dispute, the decision is final, and whatever action the EAB deems necessary will begin immediately upon announcement of the decision. The recourse available to a recruiter who does not agree with the Phase #3 decision is as follows:

1. Get the other recruiter to agree to resolve the dispute via outside formal arbitration.
2. Hire an attorney and pursue it through the appropriate court system.

Negotiations, mediation, and arbitration
If a dispute arises between any Members utilizing the services of the online system, the parties hereto shall use their best efforts to settle such disputes, claims, questions, or disagreements. To this effect, they shall consult and negotiate with each other, in good faith, recognizing their mutual interests and attempting to reach a just and equitable solution satisfactory to both parties. If a solution cannot be reached within a period of sixty (60) days, the parties agree to settle the dispute in an amicable manner by mediation administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Mediation Rules, before resorting to arbitration. Thereafter, any unresolved controversy or claim shall be settled by arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Commercial Arbitration Rules, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Any such arbitration will be conducted in a mutually agreed upon city having an American Arbitration Association office, or if no agreement on locale can be reached, the arbitration will be conducted in Cleveland, Ohio. The arbitrators shall award to the prevailing party, if any, as determined by the arbitrators, all of its costs and fees. “Costs and fees” means all reasonable pre-award expenses of the arbitration, including arbitrator’s fees; administrative fees; travel expenses; out-of-pocket expenses such as copying, telephone, court costs, and witness fees; and attorneys’ fees.

REVISED VERSION:

Finality of Top Echelon Network’s decision or the EAB’s decision

If escalated, after the Top Echelon Network EAB makes a decision on a Phase #3 dispute, the decision is final, and whatever recourse the EAB deems necessary will begin immediately upon announcement of the decision.  A recruiter who does not agree with the Phase #3 may seek to resolve the dispute via outside formal mediation or arbitration exclusively between the recruiters to take place in Canton, Ohio, administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Commercial Arbitration Rules, and judgment rendered by the mediator(s) or arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of jurisdiction.  Additionally, the award to the prevailing party, if any, shall include all costs and fees.  “Costs and fees” means all reasonable pre-award expenses of the arbitration, including arbitrator’s fees; administrative fees; travel expenses; out-of-pocket expenses such as copying, telephone, court costs, and witness fees; and attorneys’ fees.

Any disputing involving Top Echelon Network as a party must be resolved in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Top Echelon Network Service Level Agreement.

Policy #9b: Candidate Ownership After a Candidate is Placed in a Direct-Hire Position

OVERVIEW:

Under the “Spirit of the Policy” section of this policy, the wording “strongly encourage” was replaced with “requires.”

OLD VERSION:

Therefore, we strongly encourage the job order agency to confer with the original candidate recruiter about the situation, and we suggest that you both share ownership in the candidate. That is, if either of you place the candidate again, you both agree to equally split whatever dollars your firm earns on that next placement of this candidate. We have seen other recruiters deal with these situations in this way, and it appears to work well.

REVISED VERSION:

Therefore, Top Echelon Network requires the job order agency to confer with the original candidate recruiter about the situation, and share ownership in the candidate.  That is, if either Preferred Member places the candidate again, both firms agree to equally split any placement dollars earned.  Historically, this is the best solution for other Preferred Members in such situations.

Policy#11: Placement Fees, Payment Terms, Refunds, Fall-offs, and Guarantees


OVERVIEW:

Throughout the policy we replaced phrases like “should be agreed upon” and “strongly advises” to “must agree” or “requires.”  Also, additional explanation of the “Fall-off” section has been added.

OLD VERSION:

Fee schedule
The fee schedule used in a placement should be agreed upon by both agencies prior to an offer being extended to the candidate, preferably in writing.

REVISED VERSION:

Fee schedule
Both agencies must agree in writing on the fee schedule to be used in a placement prior to extending an offer to the candidate.

OLD VERSION:

Fall-offs and replacement guarantee
In the event a candidate quits or is terminated (for any reason) during the guarantee period and the job order recruiter’s guarantee is to replace the candidate or refund the money, Top Echelon Network considers this placement a “fall-off.” The agency with the candidate and Top Echelon Network are to refund the proper percentage (normally 100%) of their portion of the fee to the job order recruiter immediately. It is then the sole responsibility of the job order recruiter to replace the candidate, return the fee to the client, or work out some other arrangement with the client. The agency supplying the originating candidate is not entitled to keep its fee, because the placement was a fall-off and its candidate did not work out.

REVISED VERSION:

Fall-offs and replacement guarantee
Top Echelon Network Members agree to honor the guarantee period and refund/replacement policy that the job order recruiter executes with the client.  In the case a guarantee refund/replacement policy is not clearly executed, Top Echelon Network considers a placement to be a “fall-off” in the event a candidate quits or is terminated (for any reason) during the guarantee period and the job order recruiter’s guarantee is to replace the candidate or refund the money.  Any act of resignation within the guarantee period qualifies as a “fall-off.” The candidate recruiter and Top Echelon Network must refund the proper percentage (normally 100%) of their portion of the fee to the job order recruiter immediately when a “fall-off” occurs.  It is then the sole responsibility of the job order recruiter to replace the candidate, return the fee to the client, or work out some other arrangement with the client.  The agency supplying the originating candidate is not entitled to keep its fee, because the placement was a “fall-off” and its candidate did not work out.  See Section, Guarantee period and refund/replacement policy.

Remember, you can view the Network Policies by clicking on the appropriate link in the Members’ Area.  That link is located on the left-hand side of the page, directly under “Alerts Management” and above “Frequent Placer Program.”

As always, I want to thank you for your commitment as a Preferred Member recruiter in this Network and for abiding by these Policies in the spirit of making split placements for the purpose of growing your business.

— — —

330.455.1433, Ext. 172
MDemaree@TopEchelon.com
Connect with Mark on LinkedIn.
Follow Mark on Twitter.

Gaylord Opryland ResortThis is traditionally the time of the year that we announce our plans for the following year’s National Convention, and I’m pleased to announce that we’re going to Nashville, Tenn., for the 2012 convention.

But that’s just part of the good news.  We’re also going back to the Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, which was the site of our National Convention in 2006.  If you haven’t been to the Gaylord Opryland, it’s one of the most impressive venues we’ve ever been to and we’re looking forward to having next year’s convention there.

Okay, I know you probably have some questions, so I will answer as many of them as I can.

The dates of the 2012 National Convention are Thursday, March 22, through Saturday, March 24.  The Easter holiday next year falls on Sunday, April 8, so the convention will be a full two weeks away from that date.  This year, we held the convention in May, and it seemed many recruiters ran into scheduling conflicts with that month, so we decided that a return to earlier in the year would be in order.

We plan to release all of the information for the convention’s Early Bird Registration (preliminary agenda, logistics, etc.) sometime in December, by the middle of the month at the latest.  That way, you’ll be able to sign up for the convention before the end of 2011, which I know many recruiters like to do for tax purposes.  As always, the earlier you register for the convention, the better the price you’ll be able to secure.

As has been the case in the past, we have a block of rooms reserved at the Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center.  However, the number of rooms in that block is limited.  As a result, it will be in your best interest to book a room as soon as you possibly can.  In fact, if you know that you’ll be attending the convention, I recommend that you book your room at the hotel immediately.

If you have any additional questions regarding the 2012 National Convention, I encourage you to give us a call.  We look forward to a strong finish to this year, a great 2012 for the Network and the recruiting industry, and to seeing you in Nashville next March!

— — —

330.455.1433, Ext. 172
MDemaree@TopEchelon.com
Connect with Mark on LinkedIn.
Follow Mark on Twitter.

Mark DemareeIt’s July . . . which means it’s hot as blazes.  And it also means that the second quarter of 2011 has come to a close.

As usual, we’ve compiled our statistics for the second quarter in Top Echelon Network, and we’d like to share some of those statistics in The Pinnacle Newsletter Blog.  That’s because Preferred Member recruiters are always interested in those statistics, specifically where the placements, job orders, and candidates are.

And those are exactly the numbers that I’ll be addressing in this blog post.  A chart with all of that information is located below.

Major Disciplines

Placements

Job Orders

Candidates

00 Accounting

5.2%

4.0%

8.3%

05 Finance and Banking

0.6%

2.1%

4.0%

10 Engineering

16.7%

14.8%

22.7%

15 Scientific

5.7%

4.1%

3.4%

20 IT/Information Systems/Data Processing

20.7%

9.5%

11.5%

25 Industry and Manufacturing

20.1%

11.7%

27.4%

30 Sales and Marketing

12.1%

6.8%

21.9%

35 Insurance

0.0%

1.9%

1.9%

40 Technology & Technologists

1.1%

2.7%

5.4%

45 Personnel and Human Resources

2.3%

1.6%

5.9%

50 Construction

0.6%

1.5%

3.6%

55 Real Estate

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

60 Health Care

10.9%

18.5%

7.4%

65 Service

0.0%

6.0%

2.0%

70 Retail

0.6%

1.6%

1.7%

99 Miscellaneous

3.4%

1.6%

8.0%

As you can see, there are a handful of core disciplines within the Network that account for the majority of the split placements being made.  Those disciplines include the following:

  • IT/Information Systems/Data Processing—20.7%
  • Industry & Manufacturing—20.1%
  • Engineering—16.7%
  • Sales & Marketing—12.1%
  • Healthcare—10.9%

What’s interesting is that Industry & Manufacturing has been supplanted by IT in terms of percentage of placements.  For quite a while, Industry & Manufacturing reigned supreme, but has now been bumped to the number-two spot.  And what about job orders?  Where are they (primarily) in the Network?  Those numbers are as follows:

  • Healthcare—18.5%
  • Engineering—14.8%
  • Industry & Manufacturing—11.7%
  • IT/Information Systems/Data Processing—9.5%

While Healthcare doesn’t account for one quarter or one third of the job orders in the Network (as it once did), it still represents the highest percentage in the system.  In addition, Engineering and Industry & Manufacturing are a solid second and third, respectively.

Last but not least, where are the candidates in Top Echelon Network, at least the majority of candidates?  We have plenty of answers in that area, as well:

  • Industry & Manufacturing—27.4%
  • Engineering—22.7%
  • Sales & Marketing—21.9%
  • IT/Information Systems/Data Processing—11.5%

The discipline that has the greatest need?  Again, it’s Healthcare, with 7.4% of the candidates and 18.5% of the job orders.  Looking at the other disciplines in terms of both job orders and candidates, it’s not surprising that these are the disciplines in which recruiters are making split placements.

And that’s the bottom line: recruiters ARE making split placements in Top Echelon Network.  They’re making them every day, and the recruiters who stand the best chance of making them are those who submit their job orders and their candidates into the system.  Remember, you’re 100% guaranteed to NOT make any split placements on the information that you don’t submit to the Network.

If you have any questions about these statistics or about how you can make more split placements as a Preferred Member of Top Echelon Network, be sure to contact us.

— — —

330.455.1433, Ext. 172
MDemaree@TopEchelon.com
Connect with Mark on LinkedIn.
Follow Mark on Twitter.

Mark DemareeA couple of weeks ago, we informed the Network Membership of the passing of Preferred Member recruiter Bob Bornstein.  Just recently, two prominent individuals in the recruiting community also passed.

Those two were industry trainer Dave Knutson and Bob Style, Esq.

I had the opportunity to meet and work with both of these men.  Dave served as the main speaker for us at the 2007 Fall Conference, and he also conducted a few webinar training sessions for us.  He was a big hit with the recruiters who attended that Fall Conference, providing a wealth of valuable information, as well as plenty of laughs.  (Anybody who knew Dave knew he liked to enjoy himself, and he liked to make sure that those around him had a good time, too.)

Bob, a lawyer, was integral in the creation of the Certified Personnel Consultant (CPC) program for the National Association of Personnel Services (NAPS).  Along with Frank Burtnett, he conducted CPC and Certified Temporary Staffing Specialist (CTS) training for NAPS for a number of years.  In fact, they even conducted the training in conjunction with some of our networking events, including the 2008 National Convention in Dallas, where we were able to record their sessions.  Bob was extremely knowledgeable, and his talents and abilities helped countless recruiters down through the years.

Both men were a pleasure to know, a pleasure to work with, and will be missed greatly.

'Top Echelon TV'

A rather sizeable percentage of Top Echelon Network Preferred Member recruiters use job posting measures in order to gain more exposure for the their job orders.  Do you know what day is the most popular day for job seekers to apply for jobs online?  Well . . . we do!

In this episode of “Top Echelon TV,” Top Echelon President Mark Demaree and Internet Strategies Manager Todd Bossler not only reveal the day of the week that’s the most popular, but they also disclose the time of day, as well.  They also present some action steps that recruiters can take based on this information.

If you use job posting, when do you typically post your jobs to the Internet?  When do you update them?  Have you found that you experience more success with one day over another?  Has job posting been successful for you overall in terms of making placements?

Why do we hold events like the recent National Convention in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.?  Because they bring recruiters together to network with one another, to form relationships and friendships, and ultimately, to make split placements.

In this episode of “Top Echelon TV,” Membership Development Coordinator Drea Codispoti and Membership Development Coordinator Matt Deutsch discuss the National convention, specifically the human scavenger hunt that served as the gala event.  Nothing brings recruiters together quite like fun, and that’s exactly what this year’s event did.

 

Don’t forget—the Top Echelon Network Fall Conference is scheduled for Thursday, October 20, and Friday, October 21, and the location will be Chicago.  We look forward to seeing you there!

Mark DemareeThe Top Echelon Network offices will be closed on Monday, May 30, in observance of the Memorial Day holiday.  The offices will re-open at 8 a.m. the following day, Tuesday, May 31.

We’d like to take a moment to wish you a fun and safe Memorial Day holiday.  This is a great opportunity to get together with family and friends and also to remember those who have served our country or who are currently serving our country, both here and overseas.  We’ll keep everyone in our thoughts and prayers as they travel for parties, picnics, and barbeques.

Have a great holiday weekend!

Just how do you get your job postings to stand out and get attention?

Well, one key to accomplishing that is the job title.  The job title is often overlooked and sometimes used in the wrong way.  However, in this episode of “Top Echelon TV,” President Mark Demaree and Communications Coordinator Matt Deutsch share six ways in which recruiters can ensure that their job title can help their job posting garner the attention they want.

 

What are your thoughts regarding the job title in job postings?  How important is it?  Do you agree with the six methods we’ve advocated in this episode of “Top Echelon TV”?