Surprise! Trey Cameron is ‘Recruiter of the Month’ for April!
Actually, it’s not that much of a surprise that Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group is the “Recruiter of the Month.” After all, he’s won that award more often than not over the course of the past 12 to 18 months.
However, this time the margin of victory was far smaller for Trey, who had to edge out two other recruiters for the top honor. Remember, the number of split placements that a Preferred Member recruiter makes is just one of the determining factors.
The second factor is the amount of cash-in that those split placements produce. It just so happens that Trey’s cash-in total for the month is what pushed him over the top and garnered him yet another recognition award.
In addition, Trey currently sits atop the Network as the Top Producing Recruiter, with a sizeable lead on the rest of the Top 10.
We recognize recruiters for both monthly and quarterly performance in two categories—“Recruiter of the Month” and “Highest Split Placement Fee of the Month.”
Remember, for more information about the placements and cash-in totals associated with these awards, please login to the Members’ Area and view the profiles and placement details of the recruiters involved.
— — —
Recruiter of the Month
Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group
Trey was one of three Preferred Member recruiters to make three split placements during the month of April. However, he wins the award based upon his cash-in total for those three placements.
— — —
The position for this placement was a Global Alliance Program Director. Steve was the job order recruiter, and Jeff was the candidate recruiter. The action that stimulated this placement was listed as “Tenacious passive sourcing and epic moral support by Jeff Gilbert, the “Kingfish” of recruiting!”
— — —
Our criteria for these awards:
Top Echelon Network is a split placement network. As such, we place an emphasis on split placements, and that emphasis constitutes a large part of our criteria for these awards. We determine the monthly and quarterly award winners based upon two things, which are listed below in order of importance:
1.) The number of split placements made
2.) The amount of cash-in dollars earned as a result of those split placements
— — —