Boo-yeah! Nine Placements = ‘Recruiter of the Quarter’!
When you make nine placements in Top Echelon Network in the same quarter, there’s an excellent chance you’re going to be named “Recruiter of the Quarter.”
Well, that happened during the second quarter. The Preferred Member recruiter who accomplished the feat? None other than Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group, the Network’s “Top-Producing Recruiter” in 2011.
Cameron, who’s currently atop the 2012 leader board, is well on his way to garnering the “Top-Producing” honors once again this year.
However, Cameron wasn’t part of the “Highest Split Placement Fee of the Quarter,” so he’s NOT involved in every award we announce . . . although sometimes it seems as though that’s the case.
Below are the winners of the recognition awards for the second quarter of this year. We’d like to congratulate those recruiters who earned them and thank them for their efforts.
For more information about the placements and cash-in totals associated with these recognition awards, please login to the Members’ Area and view the profiles and placement details of the recruiters involved.
— — —
Recruiter of the Quarter
Trey Cameron of the Cameron Craig Group
You’d think that Trey wouldn’t be able to top what he did during the first quarter (seven placements), but he did just that with a whopping nine placements during the second quarter.
Other recruiters enjoyed highly productive quarters, as well, including Maria Hemminger of MJ Recruiters, LLC (six placements) and Sean Napoles, CPC of Career Brokers, Inc. and Marc Tappis of Opportunity Search, Inc. (four placements apiece).
— — —
This placement was for a Global Alliance Program Director. Copeland was the job order recruiter, and Gilbert was the candidate recruiter. The action causing this split placement was listed as, “Regular communication with another Top Echelon Network Preferred Member recruiter in my specialty area.”
— — —
Our criteria for these recognition awards:
Top Echelon Network is a split placement network. As such, we place an emphasis on split placements, and that emphasis constitutes the basis of our criteria for these recognition awards. We determine the quarterly award winners based upon two factors, which are listed below in order of importance:
1.) The number of split placements made
2.) The amount of cash-in dollars earned as a result of those split placements
In other words, the number of split placements that recruiters make is our first consideration. In the event of a tie, the cash-in total earned from those split placements is the deciding factor and serves to break the tie. Obviously, the recruiter with more cash-in dollars in the event of a tie is the recruiter who wins the recognition award.
— — —