Jim Fitzpatrick is ‘The Recruiter of the Month’ for May!
So . . . Eric Berg of JN Adams & Associates, Inc. was “The Recruiter of the Month” in Top Echelon Network for April, and now Jim Fitzpatrick of Fitzpatrick & Associates is “The Recruiter of the Month” for May. Who’s “The Recruiter of the Month” for June? Well, you’ll have to stay tuned for the answer to that question. We haven’t built a time machine. Yet.
In the meantime, we recognize recruiters for achievement in two categories every month and quarter. Those categories are “Recruiter of the Month” (as we’ve already mentioned) and “Highest Split Placement Fee of the Month.” Below are the winners of these awards for May. We’d like to congratulate the recruiters who earned them and thank them for their efforts. Remember, for more information about the placements and cash-in totals associated with these awards, please login to the Members’ Area and view the profiles and placement details of the recruiters involved.
(And yes, more information about the placements associated with these awards may be included in a future issue of The Pinnacle Newsletter Blog. Why? Why not?)
— — —
Recruiter of the Month
Jim Fitzpatrick of Fitzpatrick & Associates
Jim was one of four recruiters who made two Network placements during the month of May. However, he edged out Hani Mussa of KnowPeople, Inc.; Larry Ploscowe of EXEK Recruiters, Ltd.; and Bob Wylan of R.A. Wylan & Co., Inc. based upon his cash-in total for those placements, which was $36,542.50. Although the other three recruiters also made two placements during the month, Fitzpatrick boasted a greater cash-in total than they did.
— — —
Highest Split Placement Fee of the Month
Jim Crumpley of Jim Crumpley & Associates and Arthur Rogove of Merit Consulting, Inc.
This hefty fee was earned by placing a Director of Design Assurance. The action causing this placement was listed as “Regular phone communication with a TE Network Member in my specialty area.”
— — —
Our criteria for these awards:
Top Echelon Network is a split placement network. As such, we place an emphasis on split placements, and that emphasis constitutes the basis of our criteria for these awards. We determine the monthly and quarterly award winners based upon two factors, which are listed below in order of importance:
1.) The number of split placements made
2.) The amount of cash-in dollars earned as a result of those split placements
In other words, the number of split placements that recruiters make is our first consideration. In the event of a tie, the cash-in total earned from those split placements is the deciding factor and serves to break the tie. Obviously, the recruiter with more cash-in dollars in the event of a tie is the recruiter who wins the award.